Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Raisch, D.
Right arrow Articles by McGhan, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Raisch, D.
Right arrow Articles by McGhan, W.
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol 47, Issue 8, 1766-1773
Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Improving antiulcer agent prescribing in a health maintenance organization

DW Raisch, JL Bootman, LN Larson, and WF McGhan


A study was made of the effect of one-to-one educational meetings between prescribers and a pharmacist on the prescribing of antiulcer agents for outpatients in a health maintenance organization (HMO). Ten-minute presentations were developed that communicated the same basic facts through the use of case studies (vivid interventions) or statistical data (nonvivid interventions). After a control group (n = 8) was selected, prescribers (n = 16) were randomly assigned to receive vivid interventions or nonvivid interventions. Data on the prescribing of cimetidine, ranitidine, and sucralfate were collected for one month before the interventions and for two months afterward. Three clinical pharmacy professors independently evaluated prescriptions for appropriateness of indication, dosage, and duration. No differences in appropriateness were found between the two intervention groups, but in the first postintervention month the mean rate of inappropriate prescribing per control practitioner was 80%, versus less than 32% for the intervention groups (p less than 0.01). Each prescription in the first postintervention month entailed a mean cost of $31 per control practitioner for inappropriate prescribing, compared with less than $12 for the intervention groups (p less than 0.01). Mean costs of inappropriate prescriptions per practitioner per patient visit were $0.88 and less than or equal to $0.41 for the control and intervention groups, respectively (p less than 0.05). During postvisit month 2, inappropriate prescribing for both intervention groups increased slightly and was no longer significantly less than that in the control group. One-to-one educational meetings improved the prescribing of antiulcer agents for outpatients in an HMO.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. A. Boom, C. S. Nelson, L. E. Laufman, A. E. Kohrt, and C. A. Kozinetz
Improvement in Provider Immunization Knowledge and Behaviors Following a Peer Education Intervention
Clinical Pediatrics, October 1, 2007; 46(8): 706 - 717.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
C. L Harris, D. W Raisch, U. Abhyankar, S. Marfatia, H. M Campbell, and M. R Sather
GI Risk Factors and Use of GI Protective Agents Among Patients Receiving Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2006; 40(11): 1924 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.