Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark-Schmidt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karnes, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clark-Schmidt, A.
Right arrow Articles by Karnes, H.
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol 47, Issue 9, 2034-2037
Copyright © 1990 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Loss of carbamazepine suspension through nasogastric feeding tubes

AL Clark-Schmidt, WR Garnett, DR Lowe, and HT Karnes


The apparent loss of carbamazepine suspension during administration through polyvinyl chloride nasogastric feeding tubes in vitro was studied. Twelve methods of administering carbamazepine suspension (100 mg/5 mL) were tested; the methods differed with respect to nasogastric tube size, presence and type of diluent, and type of flush solution. Undiluted or 50% diluted carbamazepine suspension 200 mg was drawn up in a syringe and forced through adult or pediatric nasogastric feeding tubes. The tubes were immediately flushed twice with 50 mL of sterile water, 0.9% sodium chloride solution, or 5% dextrose solution, by using the same syringe used to administer the suspension. Samples were collected and analyzed for carbamazepine concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography. Each administration method was tested six times, and the results were subjected to analysis of variance. Significant loss of carbamazepine was noted for four of the six methods in which undiluted suspension was administered. In these methods, adult and pediatric tubes were flushed with sterile water or 0.9% sodium chloride. No significant loss of drug occurred for any of the methods involving the use of diluent. Significant losses were associated with diluent and flush solution but not nasogastric tube size. Carbamazepine suspension should be mixed with an equal volume of diluent before being administered through nasogastric feeding tubes.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
N. T. Williams
Medication administration through enteral feeding tubes
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 15, 2008; 65(24): 2347 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
C. F. Seifert and B. A. Johnston
A Nationwide Survey of Long-Term Care Facilities to Determine the Characteristics of Medication Administration through Enteral Feeding Catheters
Nutr Clin Pract, June 1, 2005; 20(3): 354 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
C. F. Seifert, J. L. Frye, D. C. Belknap, and D. C. Anderson Jr.
A Nursing Survey to Determine the Characteristics of Medication Administration through Enteral Feeding Catheters
Clin Nurs Res, August 1, 1995; 4(3): 290 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.