Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Enright, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flagstad, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Enright, S.
Right arrow Articles by Flagstad, M.
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol 48, Issue 9, 1908-1911
Copyright © 1991 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Quality and outcome: pharmacy's professional imperative

SM Enright and MS Flagstad


Societal forces behind the increased use of outcomes to measure the quality of health care are described, and continuous improvement of outcomes as a goal for pharmacy is discussed. Consumerism, the demands of the aging American population, and problems of access to care for many Americans have helped to bring about an examination of quality. The effectiveness of clinical decision-making methods has been challenged. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations now seeks to examine whether quality care is being provided, rather than whether the capacity exists to provide it. Inspection against criteria to determine quality will be superseded by a goal of continuous improvement. Traditional drug-use evaluation needs to go beyond collection of data and confrontation of noncompliant prescribing. Multidisciplinary quality improvement efforts should focus on patient outcomes; the goal should be to prevent all errors, rather than to not exceed some tolerable rate of errors. Pharmacists and risk managers should share information. Documentation of quality assurance efforts will be required. Drug-use evaluations should include assessment for therapeutic failure. Pharmacy quality improvement efforts can improve patient care and expand the pharmacist's role on the health-care team.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.