Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hieronim, D.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hieronim, D.
Right arrow Articles by Swanson, D.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 52, Issue 22, 2556-2559
Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Dosage of gadoteridol and adverse reactions relative to gadopentetate

DE Hieronim, E Kanal, and DP Swanson


Compliance with an institution's dosage guidelines for gadoteridol was determined, and adverse reactions to gadoteridol and gadopentetate were compared. Departmental policy in March 1993 set the standard dose of gadoteridol at 0.1 mmol/kg. A dose of 0.05 mmol/kg was set for patients with suspected acoustic neurinomas or pituitary microadenomas. Guidelines allowing a high dose of 0.2 or 0.3 mmol/kg were also established for specific indications involving suspected metastatic disease or inadequate contrast enhancement at the standard dose. Data on gadoteridol use were collected concurrently from May 1993 to January 1994 and included the dose, the indication for the dose, and any adverse reactions. Safety data for patients who had received gadopentetate between June 1988 and March 1990 were also collected and reviewed. The subjects in this retrospective analysis represented the same broad population as those involved in the concurrent evaluation of gadoteridol use. The frequency and types of adverse events in the two groups were compared. During the gadoteridol-review period, 8377 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging studies; 3558 (42.5%) of them received gadoteridol. Of the 3558 doses given, 3375 (94.9%) were 0.1 mmol/kg (the standard dose). Compliance with the guidelines for nonstandard doses was 90% for the 0.3-mmol/kg dose, 74% for the 0.2-mmol/kg dose, and 39% for the 0.05-mmol/kg dose. There were 101 adverse reactions to gadoteridol in 75 (2.1%) of the 3558 recipients. The reactions were mild to moderate and self-limiting. Records for 4892 gadopentetate recipients were analyzed. There were adverse reactions in 62 patients (1.3%). Again, most reactions were mild to moderate. The use of gadoteridol at a medical center generally complied with institutional guidelines. Gadoteridol was well tolerated whether given in standard or high doses. The frequencies and types of adverse reactions to gadoteridol and gadopentetate were similar.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
A. G. Bleicher and E. Kanal
Assessment of Adverse Reaction Rates to a Newly Approved MRI Contrast Agent: Review of 23,553 Administrations of Gadobenate Dimeglumine
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2008; 191(6): W307 - W311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. M. Colletti
Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis and Gadolinium: A Perfect Storm
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1150 - 1153.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.