Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fillingim, O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veal, D.
Right arrow Articles by Fillingim, O
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 52, Issue 5, 500-504
Copyright © 1995 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Evaluation of flow rates for six disposable infusion devices

DF Veal, CE Altman, BT McKinnon, and O Fillingim


The accuracy of flow was studied for six disposable infusion devices: Eclipse (Block Medical), Homepump (Block Medical), Intermate (Baxter Healthcare), MedFlo (Secure Medical), ReadyMED (McGaw), and SideKick (I-Flow). Each infusion device had a preset delivery rate of 100 mL/hr. Either 48 or 50 units of each device were filled with 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride injection. Flow was measured in a 60-mL syringe set 100 cm above the infusion device. The volume infused was recorded over 60 minutes at 5-minute intervals. Of the six devices tested, Homepump demonstrated the least variability in flow. The mean percentage of initial volume infused at 60 minutes was 93.7% for the Homepump, 92.4% for the MedFlo, 91.9% for the SideKick, 88.7% for the ReadyMED, 87.3% for the Eclipse, and 83.4% for the Intermate. The Intermate was the only device with a mean overall infusion rate outside the manufacturer's specifications of +/- 15%. The SideKick's mean infusion rate exceeded the +/- 15% range during the first half of the infusion. None of six disposable infusion devices delivered 100% of the volume to be infused within 60 minutes. Of the devices tested, the Homepump demonstrated the least variability in flow and the most complete volume delivery.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
M. Ackermann, S. Maier, H. Ing, and P. Bonnabry
Evaluation of the design and reliability of three elastomeric and one mechanical infusers
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. A. Skryabina and T. S. Dunn
Disposable infusion pumps.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2006; 63(13): 1260 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.