Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De Young, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by De Young, M
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 53, Issue 11, 1277-1291
Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Research on the effects of pharmacist-patient communication in institutions and ambulatory care sites, 1969-1994

M De Young


Research on the effects of pharmacist-patient communication that appeared in the pharmacy literature between 1969 and 1994 is reviewed. The terms patients education and patient counseling were used in identifying relevant research. Many authors used these terms interchangeably; also, the terms counseling and consultation often were not clearly defined. Studies of pharmacists' history-taking in institutional settings and of other communication with patients in ambulatory care settings were examined by decade. The research questions, theories, methods, results, and limitations were analyzed. More than 30 studies examined the effect of pharmacists' communication on patient outcomes, primarily knowledge and medication compliance; generally, the results suggested that pharmacists' communication led to increased knowledge and compliance. A few researchers raised concerns about patients' knowledge as an indicator of effective communication by pharmacists, and in the 1980s a few suggested that better medication compliance could be associated with the time and attention given to patients rather than the informational content of the interaction. Little was reported about the communication theories or models on which the studies were based, and there was little indication in most studies that patients' ideas about their therapy were considered. Often, the numbers of patients and pharmacists were small, and the pharmacists may have had training or motivation exceeding that of the average practitioner. In studies of pharmacists' versus physicians' history-taking, the physicians were not well described; their involvement and their approach may not have been comparable to those of the pharmacists. Before 1990, a few researchers had examined outcomes such as pulmonary function and control of diabetes. In the 1990s, more researchers looked at outcomes such as medication-related problems and use of health care resources. The research indicated that pharmacists can increase patients' knowledge of and compliance with their pharmacotherapy; however, additional research on other outcomes may be warranted.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
D. L. Singla, G. E. MacKinnon III, K. J. MacKinnon, W. Younis, and B. Field
Interdisciplinary Approach to Teaching Medication Adherence to Pharmacy and Osteopathic Medical Students
J Am Osteopath Assoc, March 1, 2004; 104(3): 127 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Pharmacy PracticeHome page
K. Olson
Integrating Pharmaceutical Care into an HIV Clinic
Journal of Pharmacy Practice, February 1, 1997; 10(1): 52 - 67.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.