Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diener, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diener, K.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 53, Issue 16, 1917-1927
Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Bisphosphonates for controlling pain from metastatic bone disease

KM Diener


The rationale for and efficacy of bisphosphonates for pain due to cancer that has metastasized to bone are reviewed. Typical strategies for controlling metastatic bone pain have consisted of opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, surgery to stabilize bone, cancer chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and radiopharmaceuticals. Cancer metastasis to bone can produce pain through the release of prostaglandins, bradykinin, substance P, and histamine; growth of tumor into surrounding tissue; stretching of the periosteum; and pathological fractures. It has been suggested that bisphosphonates can benefit these patients by decreasing the amount of pain or decreasing analgesic requirements. Bisphosphonates bind to hydroxyapatite crystals, making it more difficult for osteoclasts to recognize exposed unmineralized bone surfaces, and are directly toxic to osteoclasts. Etidronate disodium, pamidronate disodium, clodronate disodium, and alendronate sodium are bisphosphonates that have been studied in patients with painful bone metastases. Although each of these has shown at least some benefit, the most promising agent appears to be pamidronate, especially the i.v. formulation given monthly. Although oral formulations of this agent have been studied, poor bioavailability and adverse effects limit their usefulness. Adverse effects of bisphosphonates include GI reactions, impairment of renal function, anemia, and electrolyte abnormalities. Bisphosphonates are of some benefit in relieving metastatic bone pain, but the exact role, agent, route, and duration are issues that need further study.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.