Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Burnett, K.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 53, Issue 6, 651-654
Copyright © 1996 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Using bar-code technology to capture clinical intervention data in a hospital with a stand-alone pharmacy computer system

MG Scott, JC McElnay, and KM Burnett


The use of bar-code technology to capture data on pharmacists' clinical interventions is described. At a hospital in Northern Ireland, patient-specific information could not be accessed through the pharmacy computer system. A system comprising six hand-held bar-code readers and software for downloading data was purchased. The pharmacy staff selected a range of fields for recording a wide array of data on clinical interventions, including the outcomes. Patient details that could not easily be bar-coded had to be recorded manually. The process was evaluated over three four-week cycles, with the data fields being revised after each cycle and the interventions being judged for their clinical appropriateness and their conformance to inhouse standards. After the third cycle, the need for manual recording of information was eliminated. A total of 857 interventions were made during the three cycles. Performance met or exceeded the standard for 7 (50%) of 14 indicators for the first cycle, 8 (53%) of 15 for the second cycle, and 13 (81%) of 16 for the final cycle. For all three cycles, the majority of the interventions were important and resulted in an improvement in the standard of care. A bar-code-driven data collection system successfully replaced a manual system for documenting pharmacists' clinical interventions.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.