Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coley, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coley, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, R.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 54, Issue 11, 1277-1280
Copyright © 1997 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

The performance of three portable infusion-pump devices set to deliver 2 mL/hr

SC Coley, PK Shaw, and RD Leff


The performance of three portable infusion-pump devices set to deliver 2 mL/hr was studied. Portable infusion-pump devices (CADD-1, Paragon, and Singleday Infusor) were set to deliver 5% or 25% dextrose in water at 2 mL/hr for 24 hours at two environmental temperatures (25 and 35 degrees C). There were a total of 12 types of experimental runs, and each run was performed in triplicate. Flow rate accuracy and flow continuity were measured by a computerized gravimetric technique; effusate weights were measured and recorded at 30-second intervals for two hours at the beginning and two hours at the end of each run. Mean flow rates among the three devices did not differ significantly. Mean flow rate was significantly higher for the 5% dextrose solution than for the 25% dextrose solution, for the 35 degree C temperature than for the 25 degree C temperature, and during the first two hours of delivery than during the last two hours. The CADD-1 units showed an interruption of flow lasting about 30 seconds and recurring every 60 seconds; the other devices had fairly constant flow. Mean flow continuity differed significantly among the three devices. Mean flow continuity was significantly higher for the 5% dextrose solution and for the 25 degree C temperature. Flow continuity differed among three representative portable infusion-pump devices set to deliver 2 mL/hr, but flow rate accuracy did not. Fluid viscosity, environmental temperature, and elapsed time affected flow rate accuracy and flow continuity.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Oncol Pharm PractHome page
M. Ackermann, S. Maier, H. Ing, and P. Bonnabry
Evaluation of the design and reliability of three elastomeric and one mechanical infusers
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2007; 13(2): 77 - 84.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. A. Skryabina and T. S. Dunn
Disposable infusion pumps.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2006; 63(13): 1260 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.