Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McDonagh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Naden, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McDonagh, M.
Right arrow Articles by Naden, E
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 57, Issue 1, 40-43
Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Costs and savings of investigational drug services

MS McDonagh, SA Miller, and E Naden


The costs and savings resulting from two pharmacy-based investigational drug services (IDSs) for fiscal year 1996-97 were studied. The costs and savings associated with IDSs at two joint institutions were calculated by adding the cost-avoidance figures (money that would most likely have been spent, but was not because of a specific intervention or program) to the money received from services charged to study investigators or patients and subtracting salaries and overhead costs. Only drugs for which the authors could obtain prices were used to calculate cost-avoidance figures. The number of doses of marketed drugs that were provided free or for which the pharmacy was reimbursed by a drug study sponsor between July 1996 and June 1997 was tabulated from pharmacy dispensing records for each study. Investigational drugs that were not marketed or for which no marketed alternative was available were not included in the cost-avoidance calculation but were included in the charges for IDSs. The total cost of IDSs at the two institutions was $249,112. Income (representing cost avoidance and payments received) totaled $2,958,774, giving the IDSs an overall saving of $2,709,662. The two disease categories with the largest cost-avoidance figures were AIDS and oncology. In total, there was a cost avoidance of $2.9 million in drug costs, which is equivalent to 8% of the institutions' annual drug budget for 1996-97. IDSs in two institutions accounted for a combined one-year saving of over $2.7 million, most of which was attributable to cost avoidance from not having to purchase study drugs.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. S. Perrin and F. J G. Lopez
Incremental Drug Treatment Cost in HIV-Positive Patients in Industry-Sponsored Clinical Trials
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2008; 42(11): 1586 - 1591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement