Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dina, R
Right arrow Articles by Jafari, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dina, R
Right arrow Articles by Jafari, M
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 57, Issue 13, 1231-1241
Copyright © 2000 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists: an overview

R Dina and M Jafari


Angiotensin II (AT-II)-receptor antagonists are reviewed. Research focused on blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) led to the discovery of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which are effective in the treatment of hypertension but are associated with a high frequency of cough and other adverse effects. AT-II-receptor antagonists were developed as agents that would more completely block the RAS and thus decrease the adverse effects seen with ACE inhibitors. AT-II-receptor antagonists include losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, candesartan, eprosartan, telmisartan, and tasosartan. Several clinical trials have demonstrated that AT-II-receptor antagonists are as effective as calcium-channel blockers, beta-blockers, and ACE inhibitors in the treatment of hypertension and induce fewer adverse effects. The adverse effects of AT-II-receptor antagonists--dizziness, headache, upper-respiratory-tract infection, cough, and gastrointestinal disturbances--occur at about the same rate as with placebo. [corrected]. All available AT-II-receptor antagonists seem to be equally effective in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and they are comparable in cost. Currently, AT-II-receptor antagonists are used either as monotherapy in patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Angiotensin II-receptor antagonists are well tolerated and are as effective as ACE inhibitors in decreasing blood pressure.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
J. M Neutel, F W. Germino, and D. Smith
Comparison of Monotherapy with Irbesartan 150 mg or Amlodipine 5 mg for Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate Hypertension
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2005; 6(2): 84 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
I. Haulica, W. Bild, C. N Mihaila, T. Ionita, C. P Boisteanu, and B. Neagu
Biphasic effects of angiotensin (1-7) and its interactions with angiotensin II in rat aorta
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, June 1, 2003; 4(2): 124 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. A. Flockhart and J. E. Tanus-Santos
Implications of Cytochrome P450 Interactions When Prescribing Medication for Hypertension
Arch Intern Med, February 25, 2002; 162(4): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement