Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dean, B
Right arrow Articles by Barber, N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dean, B
Right arrow Articles by Barber, N
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 58, Issue 1, 54-59
Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors

B Dean and N Barber


The validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors (MAEs) were studied. Between January and June 1998, two pharmacists observed consecutive drug administration rounds by nurses on two wards in a U.K. hospital and recorded all MAEs identified. The observers intervened in cases of potentially harmful errors. MAE records were audited to determine the percentage of omitted doses for which a corresponding reason was documented for the observation periods and for nonobservation periods. Error rates for each drug administration round were analyzed according to whether they were for the nurse's first, second, third (and so on) observed round. Error rates were calculated before and after the first intervention with nurses for whom an intervention was made. Observer reliability was calculated by comparing the rates of errors identified by the two observers. There was no difference between the observation and nonobservation periods in the percentage of omitted doses for which a reason was documented, and there was no change in the error rate with repeated observations. There was no difference in error rates before and after the first intervention for each nurse. There was also no difference in error detection between the two observers and no change with increasing duration of observation. Observation of nurses during drug administration at a U.K. hospital did not significantly affect the MAE rate; nor did tactful interventions by the observers. Observer reliability was high. Concerns about the validity and reliability of observational methods for identifying MAEs may be unfounded.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. I. Westbrook, J. Braithwaite, A. Georgiou, A. Ampt, N. Creswick, E. Coiera, and R. Iedema
Multimethod Evaluation of Information and Communication Technologies in Health in the Context of Wicked Problems and Sociotechnical Theory
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 746 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
B. D. Franklin, K. O'Grady, P. Donyai, A. Jacklin, and N. Barber
The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 16(4): 279 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
C. Haw, J. Stubbs, and G. Dickens
An observational study of medication administration errors in old-age psychiatric inpatients
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2007; 19(4): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
B D Franklin, K O'Grady, J Parr, and I Walton
Using the internet to deliver education on drug safety.
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2006; 15(5): 329 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
I. D. Maidment and A. Thorn
A medication error reporting scheme: analysis of the first 12 months
Psychiatr. Bull., August 1, 2005; 29(8): 298 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
P Y Han, I D Coombes, and B Green
Factors predictive of intravenous fluid administration errors in Australian surgical care wards
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 179 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
D H Cousins, B Sabatier, D Begue, C Schmitt, and T Hoppe-Tichy
Medication errors in intravenous drug preparation and administration: a multicentre audit in the UK, Germany and France
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2005; 14(3): 190 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
G. Armitage, A. Holder, and I. Hodgson
Using ethnography (or qualitative methods) to investigate drug errors: A critique of a published study
Journal of Research in Nursing, September 1, 2004; 9(5): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J Carthey
The role of structured observational research in health care
Qual. Saf. Health Care, December 1, 2003; 12(90002): ii13 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
K Taxis and N Barber
Causes of intravenous medication errors: an ethnographic study
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2003; 12(5): 343 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Taxis and N. Barber
Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors
BMJ, March 29, 2003; 326(7391): 684 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. N. Barker, E. A. Flynn, G. A. Pepper, D. W. Bates, and R. L. Mikeal
Medication Errors Observed in 36 Health Care Facilities
Arch Intern Med, September 9, 2002; 162(16): 1897 - 1903.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
B Dean
Learning from prescribing errors
Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2002; 11(3): 258 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.