Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldwater, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldwater, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, B
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 58, Issue 18, 1740-1745
Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Comparison of therapeutic interchange with standard educational tools for influencing fluoroquinolone prescribing

SH Goldwater, G Milkovich, Morrison AJ Jr, and B Lindgren


The abilities of therapeutic interchange (TI) and standard educational tools (SET) to change prescribing habits were compared. We evaluated the replacement of ciprofloxacin with levofloxacin in a four-hospital health system during a 14-month study period. Two hospitals used TI and two SET. The demographics, sites of infection, and severity of illness were analyzed for 554 patients treated at SET hospitals and 1323 patients treated at TI hospitals during a total of 2040 hospitalizations over a 14-month period. In TI hospitals, 97% of patients received levofloxacin, whereas 43% received levofloxacin in SET hospitals (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were not significantly different for the two groups, although more patients in the SET hospitals received combination antimicrobial therapy. Differences in savings per patient were significant between TI hospitals ($60) and SET hospitals ($37) (p < 0.001). The total annualized savings for all four hospitals was $156,444. TI was more effective than SET in facilitating changes in prescribing patterns in a health care system and resulted in significant cost savings to hospitals and payers.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
ASHP Guidelines on Medication Cost Management Strategies for Hospitals and Health Systems
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2008; 65(14): 1368 - 1384.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.