Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.
Right arrow Articles by White, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, J.
Right arrow Articles by White, C.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 58, Issue 8, 689-694
Copyright © 2001 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Pharmacokinetic comparison of omeprazole capsules and a simplified omeprazole suspension

JC Song, RA Quercia, C Fan, J Tsikouris, and CM White


The pharmacokinetics of omeprazole delayed-release capsules and a simplified omeprazole suspension (SOS) were studied. Seven healthy volunteers randomly received either one 20-mg omeprazole delayed-release capsule or SOS (omeprazole 20 mg in 10 mL) for seven days before being crossed over to the opposite treatment for seven more days after a two-week washout period. On days 1 and 7, blood samples were drawn at intervals up to 360 minutes after drug administration. Plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic method, and pharmacokinetic values were determined. Area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC) from zero to six hours, AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity), and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) increased by 102%, 113%, and 85%, respectively, after seven days of treatment with the capsule. AUC0-infinity for SOS on day 1 was 58% of that for the capsule (p = 0.0141), and on day 7 it was 49% of that for the capsule (p = 0.0044). AUC0-infinity for SOS increased by 85% from day 1 to 7, but the difference was not significant. Cmax for SOS on day 1 was twice that for the capsule (p = 0.0014), but by day 7 the difference between the two formulations was negligible. Time to Cmax (tmax) for SOS on days 1 and 7 was shorter than for the capsule by 82% (p < 0.0001) and 70% (p < 0.0006), respectively. After one week of therapy, omeprazole absorption was faster and tmax was 70% shorter for SOS than for the capsule formulation, but AUC0-infinity was 49% lower for SOS.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. W. Devlin
Proton pump inhibitors for acid suppression in the intensive care unit: Formulary considerations
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., May 15, 2005; 62(10_Supplement_2): S24 - S30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.