Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schachtner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Speizer, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schachtner, J.
Right arrow Articles by Speizer, R
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 59, Issue 6, 529-533
Copyright © 2002 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Prevalence and cost savings of therapeutic interchange among U.S. hospitals

JM Schachtner, R Guharoy, JJ Medicis, N Newman, and R Speizer


The prevalence and cost savings of therapeutic interchange (TI) among teaching, nonteaching, and investor-owned hospitals in the United States was studied. A survey was sent to all directors of pharmacy at hospitals listed in the 1999 American Hospital Association directory as having more than 100 beds; 463 (29.8%) hospitals responded. The survey elicited data about hospital demographics, the policies and personnel involved in TI, and the estimated cost savings incurred by the use of TI. Eighty-eight percent of teaching, 89% of nonteaching, and 100% of investor-owned hospitals reported having established TI policies and procedures; 88% of responding hospitals reported the use of TI as a means of formulary management. Individuals involved in the decision-making process for TI policies included physicians, pharmacists, and pharmacy and therapeutics committee members. Most responding hospitals reported having an automatic interchange procedure, and few required physician consent before the substitution was made. The most commonly substituted medication classes were histamine H2-receptor antagonists, proton-pump inhibitors, antacids, and quinolones. Differences in TI procedures and the medication classes commonly substituted were not significant between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. The annual dollar savings was estimated by 36% of teaching, 38% of nonteaching, and 50% of investor-owned hospitals and determined by record keeping in 18% of teaching, 20% of nonteaching, and 40% of investor-owned hospitals. Eighty-eight percent of teaching, 89% of nonteaching, and 100% of investor-owned hospitals have established TI policies. Significant variation in cost savings occurred when hospitals attempted to estimate the annual dollar savings, as no adequate commercially available software exists to perform this task.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
ASHP Guidelines on Medication Cost Management Strategies for Hospitals and Health Systems
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2008; 65(14): 1368 - 1384.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
M. G Kendrach and M. Kelly-Freeman
Approximate Equivalent Rosuvastatin Doses for Temporary Statin Interchange Programs
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2004; 38(7): 1286 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. N Carroll and E. B Hudson
Authors' Reply
Ann. Pharmacother., December 1, 2003; 37(12): 1916 - 1917.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.