Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Crismon, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chuang, W.
Right arrow Articles by Crismon, M.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue 14, 1459-1467
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Evaluation of a schizophrenia medication algorithm in a state hospital

WC Chuang and ML Crismon


Provider's practice behaviors before and after physician and staff training in the use of a schizophrenia medication algorithm and the effects of education on physician adherence to the algorithm were evaluated. Medical records of 30 patients admitted between September 1 and November 30, 1999, and 30 patients admitted from September 1 to November 30, 2000, with an admitting and discharge diagnosis of schizophrenia and a minimum length of stay of 14 days were randomly selected and analyzed. Clinical data, including prescribed psychotropic medications and dosages, documentation of target symptoms and severity, adverse drug effects, appropriate clinical ratings, patient's response to treatment, and reason for medication change, were collected and compared with the recommendations in the schizophrenia medication algorithm. Efforts to implement the schizophrenia algorithm included staff education and uniform documentation. Progress notes were evaluated before and after training. After physician and staff training, only 5 of 359 progress notes were written using the recommended documentation form. The number of progress notes containing no documentation of symptoms decreased from 66 to 41, and those documenting three to five target symptoms increased from 74 to 140. Documentation of physician assessment of the presence or absence of adverse effects and their severity decreased from 35.2% to 18.7% and from 22.3% to 17.0%, respectively. Physicians increased the documentation of their clinical global impressions from 12.1% to 20.3%. The recording of medication changes increased twofold, but the difference was not significant. Physician and staff education alone did not significantly alter providers' practice behavior. Inadequate and inconsistent documentation of clinical outcomes made it difficult to assess physician adherence to the treatment algorithm.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.