Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spruill, W.
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spruill, W.
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, R.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue 17, 1741-1749
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Determining institution-specific costs of thromboembolic events with an algorithm and spreadsheet

WJ Spruill, WE Wade, and RB Leslie


A systematic process whereby an institution may perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis of all direct medical costs associated with the diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) that reflects both institution-specific costs and clinical practice patterns is described. Current Content, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and MEDLINE were searched to identify English-language articles addressing procedures for diagnosing and treating symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. From the information gathered, a diagnostic algorithm and a resource spreadsheet were developed. The diagnostic procedures were classified as standard, alternative, confirmatory, or supplemental. The spreadsheet resources were assigned priorities based on practice standards and quantified on the basis of units typically used in the clinical setting. Three major categories of resources were identified: diagnostic, treatment, and laboratory test monitoring. Diagnostic procedures consisted of five subcategories containing 31 cost resources, treatments consisted of nine subcategories with 26 cost resources, and laboratory monitoring tests consisted of 9 cost resources. Units of use for all resources identified were also noted. A systematic process utilizing a diagnostic algorithm and a spreadsheet was developed to facilitate the determination of institution-specific costs associated with the diagnosis, treatment, and laboratory test monitoring of VTEs.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.