Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hennessy, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hennessy, D.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue 18, 1850-1852
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Recovery of phenytoin from feeding formulas and protein mixtures

DD Hennessy


The recovery of phenytoin from mixtures containing different phenytoin formulations and protein mixtures was studied. Three phenytoin solutions (40 mg/microL) were prepared, each in triplicate, from phenytoin tablets, phenytoin suspension, and bulk phenytoin powder. These solutions were mixed with equivalent volumes of two commercially available feeding formulas (Replete and Ultracal) and two isolated protein mixtures (casein protein mixture and why protein isolates mixture) and placed in ultrafiltration tubes. The mixtures were centrifuged, and phenytoin recovery was determined by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Control data were also obtained before and after the experiment. There was no difference in phenytoin recovery when comparing phenytoin tablets versus phenytoin suspension in any of the protein media. There was a significant difference in phenytoin recovery when comparing the standard phenytoin solution mixed with Replete (32.51%) versus Ultracal (37.71%). There was also a significant difference in recovery when comparing the standard solution mixed with the calcium caseinate mixture (48.41%) versus the whey protein isolates mixture (82.01%). While the difference in recovery between Replete and Ultracal was expected, the significantly higher recovery of phenytoin from the whey protein mixture versus the calcium caseinate mixture indicated a much lower binding affinity between phenytoin and whey protein than with phenytoin and casein. The recovery of unbound phenytoin from feeding formulas and solutions of protein isolates did not differ with phenytoin formulations. Ultracal had a lower level of binding to phenytoin than Replete; whey protein had a lower level of binding than casein.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
N. T. Williams
Medication administration through enteral feeding tubes
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 15, 2008; 65(24): 2347 - 2357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.