Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bieszk, N
Right arrow Articles by Zarowitz, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bieszk, N
Right arrow Articles by Zarowitz, B
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue 4, 360-366
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Detection of medication nonadherence through review of pharmacy claims data

N Bieszk, R Patel, A Heaberlin, K Wlasuk, and B Zarowitz


The utility of pharmacy claims data in detecting improper medication use, medication changes, and formulary adherence was assessed. Pharmacists provided six months of pharmacy claims data to primary care physicians for patients on the day of their scheduled clinic appointments. Similar data, not supplied to physicians, were generated for a matched population of patients on the day of their scheduled clinic appointments. A blinded pharmacist abstracter reviewed dictated office notes for both control and treatment groups. Medication adherence and medication changes were assessed by the abstracter as well as the difference in total medication costs for each of the groups before and after the pharmacy claims data were supplied. Surveys were distributed to physicians to determine whether pharmaceutical care was improved by the pharmacy claims data. In the treatment group, physicians detected medication nonadherence in 30.5% of their patients, while the abstracter noted nonadherence in 58.1% of patients. Physicians failed to detect any nonadherence in the control group, but the abstractor detected nonadherence in 57.1% of these patients. Changes in medication regimens occurred more often in the treatment group (p < 0.001). The mean percentage of patients switched to formulary agents significantly differed between the treatment and control groups (27.7% versus 0.0%, respectively) (p < 0.001). There were no differences in median drug costs for either group before or after the pharmacy claims data were provided. Provision of pharmacy claims data to physicians helped them detect medication nonadherence, evaluate therapeutic duplication or omissions, increase formulary use, and reduce the time required to obtain an accurate medication history.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. A. Chisholm-Burns, W. J. Kwong, L. L. Mulloy, and C. A. Spivey
Nonmodifiable characteristics associated with nonadherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2008; 65(13): 1242 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
K. Z. Bambauer, A. S. Adams, F. Zhang, N. Minkoff, A. Grande, R. Weisblatt, S. B. Soumerai, and D. Ross-Degnan
Physician alerts to increase antidepressant adherence: fax or fiction?
Arch Intern Med, March 13, 2006; 166(5): 498 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
M. A. Chisholm, C. E. Lance, and L. L. Mulloy
Patient factors associated with adherence to immunosuppressant therapy in renal transplant recipients
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2005; 62(17): 1775 - 1781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.