Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuti, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuti, J.
Right arrow Articles by Nicolau, D.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue 6, 565-568
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Economic benefit of a meropenem dosage strategy based on pharmacodynamic concepts

JL Kuti, D Maglio, CH Nightingale, and DP Nicolau


The economic benefit of a meropenem dosage strategy based on pharmacodynamic concepts is described. The pharmacodynamics of novel meropenem dosing regimens were compared with FDA-approved regimens by using Monte Carlo simulation with 5000 subjects. Using the meropenem NCCLS-susceptibility breakpoint of 4 micrograms/mL, the percentage of the dosing interval that drug concentration remained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (%t > MIC) was calculated for each regimen. Probability distributions for half-life and volume of distribution using previously published pharmacokinetic data from healthy volunteers were developed. Cost-minimization analysis was performed from the institution's perspective using both drug acquisition and supply costs. Daily costs for the lower dosage regimens were calculated using 2001 average wholesale prices. The mean %t > MIC for meropenem 500 mg administered every six hours (43.91% [95% confidence interval (CI), 36.77-51.46%]) was similar to that of 1000 mg every eight hours (45.77% [95% CI, 40.06-50.69%]). The mean %t > MIC for meropenem 1000 mg administered every six hours (61.02% [95% CI, 54.71-67.43%]) was similar to the regimen of 2000 mg every eight hours (57.77% [95% CI, 51.84-63.76%]). The 500-mg regimen reduced drug costs by $38.64 per day compared with the standard regimen of 1000 mg administered every eight hours. A pharmacodynamically influenced dosage strategy for meropenem resulted in %t > MIC exposure similar to standard regimens and required a lesser amount of the drug, thereby reducing costs without compromising efficacy.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. E Ariano, A. Nyhlen, J P. Donnelly, D. S Sitar, G. K. Harding, and S. A Zelenitsky
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Meropenem in Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Bacteremia
Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2005; 39(1): 32 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Clin PharmacolHome page
J. L. Kuti, P. K. Dandekar, C. H. Nightingale, and D. P. Nicolau
Use of Monte Carlo Simulation to Design an Optimized Pharmacodynamic Dosing Strategy for Meropenem
J. Clin. Pharmacol., October 1, 2003; 43(10): 1116 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.