Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Akers, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, D.
Right arrow Articles by Akers, W.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue suppl_4, S16-S20
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Effect of nesiritide versus milrinone in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure

DA Lewis, NR Gurram, WT Abraham, and WS Akers


The use of nesiritide in the improvement of patient hemodynamics, decreased length of stay (LOS), and rehospitalization is discussed. Nesiritide is a useful agent for the treatment of the acutely decompensated heart failure patient. Previous trials suggest that the use of nesiritide results in improved outcomes as compared with other agents. To date, there are no data comparing nesiritide to milrinone in the treatment of the acutely decompensated heart failure patient. Fifty-five patients admitted to the heart failure service were identified retrospectively; 29 received nesiritide and 26 received milrinone. Baseline characteristics, hemodynamic data, and LOS data were collected. Primary outcomes were the overall LOS, intensive care LOS, and readmission within 30 days of discharge. Other outcomes included duration of vasoactive agents used, overall diuresis, and total cost of therapy. Baseline hemodynamic data were similar between groups. Patients in the milrinone group had an overall LOS of 8.2 days compared to 7 days in the nesiritide group (p = NS). LOS in the intensive care unit was 5.9 days in the milrinone group compared with 3.9 days in the nesiritide group (p = 0.007). Readmission at 30 days was 28% in the milrinone group compared with 16% in the nesiritide group (p = NS). Infusion time was shorter in the nesiritide group, 50 versus 117 hours (p = 0.001). Cost of therapy (cost of bed, supplies, and drug) was $398 less per patient receiving nesiritide. The use of nesiritide led to improvement in patient hemodynamics and resulted in a trend toward decreases in LOS and rehospitalization. Total cost of therapy was lower in the nesiritide group as compared to those patients treated with milrinone.
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.