Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greinacher, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greinacher, A
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 60, Issue suppl_5, S12-S18
Copyright © 2003 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Treatment options for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A Greinacher


Appropriate management, as well as efficacy and safety, of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and prevention of severe consequences with argatroban and lepirudin are discussed. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, a serious immune-mediated drug reaction, can occur as an isolated incident (isolated HIT) or with acute thrombosis sometimes referred to as HIT and associated thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). Due to the severe consequences associated with HIT, appropriate management is critical. Argatroban and lepirudin, two direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), are currently FDA approved for use in patients with HIT. The clinical experience with these agents is critically examined in this article. The safety and efficacy of argatroban in management of HIT were the subject of a single published clinical trial. The study was designed to reflect conventional clinical practice, whereby treatment of patients with HIT was initiated upon clinical suspicion. In several of these patients, HIT antibodies could not be demonstrated. Compared to historical controls, argatroban demonstrated efficacy in patients with isolated HIT; however, no differences were observed in HIT patients with acute thrombosis. Rates of bleeding episodes did not differ between argatroban and control. The clinical efficacy and safety of lepirudin have been the subject of three clinical trials and one large drug monitoring program. Lepirudin has demonstrated benefit in HIT patients with or without existing thromboembolism. Bleeding rates were higher than in the historical control. However, bleedings requiring transfusion did not differ. Although no direct head-to-head comparison trials of argatroban and lepirudin have been conducted, parallels can be drawn between the agents based on careful review of published clinical trials. Consistently, rates of new thrombosis, limb amputation, and death appear to be lower in patients treated with lepirudin as compared with those treated with argatroban, whereas the risk for major bleeding per patient day seems to be similar with both DTIs.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
C. Verme-Gibboney, J. W. Dubb, S. A. Spinler, and A. Greinacher
Direct thrombin inhibitors in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 1, 2005; 62(3): 247 - 250.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.