Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forster, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, M.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 61, Issue 14, 1466-1472
Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Pharmacist surveillance of adverse drug events

AJ Forster, RB Halil, and MG Tierney


PURPOSE: The incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs), preventable ADEs, and potential ADEs was determined using pharmacist surveillance. Drug classes associated with ADEs were also identified. METHODS: The study was conducted in a 30-bed hospital ward of a Canadian teaching hospital between April 28, 2003, and May 26, 2003. All patients admitted to the general medicine service were eligible for study enrollment. A pharmacist performed surveillance to identify new or worsening symptoms, critical laboratory values, and medication errors. Surveillance consisted of daily communications with staff, daily chart reviews for all inpatients, and investigation of spontaneous incident reports. Data were collected to describe all identified outcomes. This information was rated independently by two clinicians to determine if the outcome was an ADE, a preventable ADE, or a potential ADE. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate outcome rates, which were reported as events per 100 patient-days. RESULTS: During 543 patient-days of observation, 24 ADEs occurred (4.4 per 100 patient-days), of which 14 were preventable (2.6 per 100 patient-days); 13 potential ADEs also occurred (2.4 per 100 patient-days). Of all ADEs, 3 (13%) were life threatening, 11 (46%) were serious, and 10 (42%) were significant. The 24 ADEs were associated with nine different drug classes. Four drug classes accounted for 17 ADEs (71%): antidiabetic agents, antibiotics, glucocorticoids, and sedatives and hypnotics. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist surveillance revealed that 4.4 ADEs occurred per 100 patient-days, over half of which were preventable. All preventable and potential ADEs occurred during the ordering and administration stages of medication delivery.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
L. Nissen
Current status of pharmacist influences on prescribing of medicines
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2009; 66(5_Supplement_3): s29 - s34.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
S.-H. Hwang, S. Lee, H.-K. Koo, and Y. Kim
Evaluation of a computer-based adverse-drug-event monitor
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2008; 65(23): 2265 - 2272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
G. K Al-Tajir and W. N Kelly
Epidemiology, Comparative Methods of Detection, and Preventability of Adverse Drug Events
Ann. Pharmacother., July 1, 2005; 39(7): 1169 - 1174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Med Inform AssocHome page
A. J Forster, J. Andrade, and C. van Walraven
Validation of a Discharge Summary Term Search Method to Detect Adverse Events
JAMIA, March 1, 2005; 12(2): 200 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement