Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vondracek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vondracek, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hansen, L.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 61, Issue 17, 1801-1811
Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Current approaches to the management of osteoporosis in men

SF Vondracek and LB Hansen


PURPOSE: The epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis in men are reviewed. SUMMARY: Men with osteoporosis account for approximately one fifth of all patients with osteoporosis, and their morbidity and mortality rates from this disease are higher than in other patients. Guidelines specifically addressing the management of osteoporosis in men are not available. Lifestyle modifications, including smoking cessation, limited alcohol consumption, routine exercise, and fall prevention strategies, are beneficial to maintain bone health. Appropriate calcium and vitamin D intakes are critical components of any osteoporosis management strategy. Drug therapy should be initiated in all men at high risk for fracture. Alendronate is indicated for the treatment of osteoporosis. It is considered first-line therapy because of its efficacy and safety profiles. Teriparatide is indicated for the management of osteoporosis in high-risk men, but the drug's cost, complex administration schedule, and potential risks have caused it to be restricted to a second-line therapy. Other options reserved for select patients include calcitonin and testosterone. Further studies are needed to better understand the distinctive features and management strategies for men with osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: While the rate of osteoporosis in men is lower than in women, the consequences are possibly more devastating. Evaluation of secondary causes, especially hypogonadism, is important, as they can play a significant role in the development of osteoporosis in men. All men should be educated to improve modifiable risk factors and maintain recommended daily intakes of calcium and vitamin D. Bone mineral density should be evaluated in high-risk men using central dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, and drug treatment should be considered in those with a history of low-trauma fracture or significant bone loss.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
radtechHome page
B. FURLOW
Osteoporosis in Men
Radiol. Technol., January 1, 2006; 77(3): 226 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.