Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosenberg, J.
Right arrow Articles by McGuire, H
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol 61, Issue 19, 2023-2032
Copyright © 2004 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Current status of pharmacist-operated drug information centers in the United States

JM Rosenberg, T Koumis, JP Nathan, LA Cicero, and H McGuire


PURPOSE: Pharmacist-operated drug information centers (DICs) in the United States and Puerto Rico were surveyed, and the results were compared with those of similar surveys conducted over the past 30 years. METHODS: In January 2003, surveys were mailed to 151 institutions that were thought to have an organized DIC, defined as a center that regularly accepts a broad scope of requests from health care professionals, regardless of the location or affiliation of those professionals. The survey covered such topics as affiliations, staffing, services, resources, quality assurance, involvement in education, and funding. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen DICs responded (79%), of which 81 met the criteria. Hospitals and medical centers and colleges and schools of pharmacy continued to be the most commonly reported affiliations. The number of DICs declined in the past decade, and the number of DIC pharmacists and other personnel was the lowest reported in the past 30 years. Drug information pharmacists appeared to be better trained than in the past, and a larger percentage had advanced degrees. Services provided by DICs remained consistent with previous findings, except for greater participation in the training and education of pharmacy students and residents. The resource most commonly reported by DICs as useful was Micromedex Healthcare Series, followed by MEDLINE and AHFS Drug Information. The percentage of DICs with formal quality assurance programs did not change significantly in the past decade. Funding sources and fee-for-service activities remained the same. CONCLUSION: The number of DICs has declined steadily since 1986, and the number of drug information pharmacists is at its lowest in 30 years. DIC services continue to be comprehensive. Only half of the DICs surveyed had a formal quality assurance program.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
C. S. Wisniewski, T. L. Pummer, and E. P. Krenzelok
Documenting drug information questions using software for poison information documentation
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2009; 66(11): 1039 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. F Thompson
A Personal View of the History and Future Direction of Drug Information
Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2006; 40(2): 307 - 308.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
E. M. Timpe and S. E. Motl
Frequency and complexity of queries to an academic drug information center, 1995-2004
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2005; 62(23): 2511 - 2514.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.