Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 62, Number 10 Supplement_2, S4-S10
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welage, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welage, L. S.

Overview of pharmacologic agents for acid suppression in critically ill patients

Lynda S. Welage

LYNDA S. WELAGE, PHARM.D., FCCP, is Professor of Clinical Sciences and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, The University of Michigan, College of Pharmacy, 428 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065 (lswelage{at}umich.edu).


Purpose. The physiology of acid secretion, rationale and goals for acid suppression in critically ill patients, and mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are discussed.

Summary. Acid-suppressant therapy may be used in critically ill patients to prevent stress-related mucosal disease or the recurrence of peptic ulcer bleeding. The intragastric pH goal is 3.5–4.5 and 6 or higher, respectively. H2RAs block only one of three pathways in acid secretion and provide less potent acid suppression than PPIs, which block the final common pathway in acid secretion. In addition, tolerance that occurs with H2RAs does not occur with PPIs. All PPIs work in a similar manner, but differences exist in the pharmacokinetic profiles and binding to the proton pump; the clinical relevance of these differences remains debated. The safety profiles of H2RAs and PPIs are similar; however, the H2RA dose, but not the PPI dose, must be adjusted for patients with renal dysfunction. The risk of drug interactions mediated by cytochrome P-450 enzymes is lower with PPIs than with cimetidine, an H2RA. Several new PPI dosage forms have been introduced, facilitating drug administration in the critical care setting.

Conclusion. Both H2RAs and PPIs are safe agents to use for providing acid suppression in critically ill patients, but PPIs offer several potential advantages over H2RAs.

Index terms: Cimetidine; Critical illness; Dosage; Dosage forms; Drug interactions; Gastrointestinal drugs; Kidney failure; Mechanism of action; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Tolerance; Toxicity

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.