Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 62, Issue 15, 1606-1612
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Puscalau, G.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, T. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Puscalau, G.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, T. P.

Reports

Reliability of preparation procedure for sphingosomal vincristine

Georgeta Puscalau, Paul Johnson and Thomas P. Weber

GEORGETA PUSCALAU, M.SC., is Senior Manager, Analytical Operations, Quality Management; PAUL JOHNSON, PH.D., is Manager, Technical Writing, Commercial Operations; and THOMAS P. WEBER, PH.D., is Senior Director, Pharmaceutics, Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Address correspondence to Ms. Puscalau at Inex Pharmaceuticals Corporation, 100-8900 Glenlyon Parkway, Burnaby, BC, Canada, V5J-5J8 (gpuscalau{at}inexpharm.com).


Purpose. The reliability of the preparation procedure for sphingosomal vincristine was studied. The effect of minor variations in the constitution conditions on the integrity of the drug product was also examined.

Methods. Two studies were conducted. The laboratory study, which had two parts, was conducted to determine the effects of deliberately varying the constitution conditions, including such key parameters as incubation time and incubation temperature. In the field study, 20 pharmacists unfamiliar with sphingosomal vincristine were asked to constitute the product using the written instructions provided in the package insert as their sole guidance. All samples in both studies were evaluated by measuring key product characteristics, including free (un-encapsulated) vincristine sulfate, total vincristine sulfate, vincristine degradation products, and in vitro release rate. Vincristine loading into sphingosomes was considered acceptable if the percentage of free vincristine sulfate did not exceed 10%.

Results. In the laboratory study, samples that were incubated at 60–75 °C for 5–60 minutes met all the acceptance criteria. However, acceptable loading was not achieved for samples that were incubated at 55 °C for 10 minutes or less. In the field study, all the pharmacist-prepared samples met the acceptance criteria, with the results for free vincristine sulfate demonstrating a high degree of statistical confidence in the reliability of the loading procedure.

Conclusion. The recommended constitution procedure of sphingosomal vincristine from a three-vial kit can be reliably performed in pharmacies with a high degree of confidence. Small variations in temperature and incubation time had no effects on the quality of the product.

Index terms: Antineoplastic agents; Compounding; Concentration; Control; quality; Injections; Liposomes; Package inserts; Release; Stability; Storage; Temperature; Vincristine sulfate

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.