Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
Utility of an online medication-error-reporting systemSCOTT W. SAVAGE, PHARM.D., M.S., is Pharmacy Manager, Medical College of Georgia Health System, Augusta, and Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens. PHILIP J. SCHNEIDER, M.S., FASHP, is Clinical Professor and Director, Latiolais Leadership Program; and CRAIG A. PEDERSEN, PH.D., is Associate Professor, Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, College of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus. Address correspondence to Dr. Savage at the Medical College of Georgia Health System, 1120 15th Street, BI-2101, Augusta, GA 30912 (ssavage{at}mail.mcg.edu).
Methods. A survey regarding the utility of Medmarx was developed and mailed to 550 hospitals and health systems that used the medication-error-reporting program. Primary contact persons were identified and asked to gather and report the necessary information to adequately characterize medication-error reporting in their institution before and after implementing the Medmarx system. Potential respondents were contacted four times during the survey period by the United States Pharmacopeia.
Results. Of the 550 surveys sent, 200 were returned and 25 were undeliverable, resulting in a response rate of 38%. The average number of medication errors reported internally increased twofold after the adoption of the Medmarx system. Pharmacy departments were most often reported as responsible for medication-safety oversight activities after Medmarx implementation. Most facilities (94%) generated reports from the medication-error database, and 75% used this information to identify 7.0 ± 8.1 opportunities to improve their medication-use system annually. Most respondents believed that Medmarx played an integral role in preparing their facility for Joint Commission accreditation surveys (65%), provided a tool for root-cause analysis (71%), and helped identify problems in the medication-use process (85%). The annual costs of the subscription and staff time required to use the system was estimated to be $16,756 ± $21,108. Sixty-six percent of users were satisfied with the impact the system has had on improving the medication-use process.
Conclusion. Implementation of the Medmarx system led to an increase in the number of reported medication errors and improvements in the medication-use process.
Index terms: Computers; Data collection; Drug use; Economics; Errors, medication; Hospitals; Medmarx; Pharmacy, institutional, hospital; Reports
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||