Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 62, Issue 9, 917-920
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, W.
Right arrow Articles by Lodolce, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Adachi, W.
Right arrow Articles by Lodolce, A. E.

Report

Use of failure mode and effects analysis in improving the safety of i.v. drug administration

Wayne Adachi and Amy E. Lodolce

WAYNE ADACHI, PHARM.D., is Director of Pharmacy and Diagnostic Imaging, Good Samaritan Hospital, San Jose, CA. AMY E. LODOLCE, PHARM.D., BCPS, is Clinical Assistant Professor and Drug Information Specialist, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago.

Address correspondence to Dr. Lodolce at the College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street (MC 886), Chicago, IL 60612-7230 (aelo{at}uic.edu).


Purpose. Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was used to identify dosing and administration errors associated with i.v. medications and evaluate the effectiveness of subsequent system improvements.

Summary. A multidisciplinary medication safety team conducted an FMEA to identify and reduce common medication errors and selected wrong-dose errors for process improvement. In 2002, wrong-dose errors comprised 17% of all medication errors at the hospital (59 of 347 errors). The most common reason for administering the wrong dose was error in programming the i.v. infusion pump (41%). Potential errors (i.e., failures) identified were misinterpretation of the order, removing the wrong medication or wrong concentration of the correct medication, using the wrong diluent or drug to prepare the drip, and entering the wrong concentration or infusion rate on the pump. Errors in programming the i.v. infusion pump was the step in the medication-use process associated with the highest criticality index. Based on the results of the FMEA, two main interventions were performed. First, standard order sets were revised after streamlining the formulary and eliminating the use of unapproved abbreviations. Second, an i.v. pump with enhanced safety features was implemented. One-year follow-up data revealed that the number of medication errors related to dosing (wrong dose or incorrect infusion rate) had decreased slightly (from 59 in 2002 to 46 in 2003); however, a dramatic reduction was noted in the percentage of pump-related errors. In 2003, pump-related errors accounted for 22% of dosing errors, compared with 41% in 2002.

Conclusion. Medication errors related to i.v. infusion pumps were reduced by conducting an FMEA and implementing the process changes needed.

Index terms: Abbreviations; Devices; Diluents; Dosage; Drug administration rate; Errors, medication; Formularies; Hospitals; Injections; Medication orders; Methodology; Toxicity

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
S. E McDowell, S. Mt-Isa, D. Ashby, and R E Ferner
Where errors occur in the preparation and administration of intravenous medicines: a systematic review and Bayesian analysis
Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 11, 2010; (2010) qshc.2008.029785v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. H. Abujudeh and R. Kaewlai
Radiology Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: What Is It?
Radiology, August 1, 2009; 252(2): 544 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
M. Gilchrist, B. D. Franklin, and J. P. Patel
An outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) map to identify risks associated with an OPAT service
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., July 1, 2008; 62(1): 177 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
T. B. Wetterneck, K. A. Skibinski, T. L. Roberts, S. M. Kleppin, M. E. Schroeder, M. Enloe, S. S. Rough, A. S. Hundt, and P. Carayon
Using failure mode and effects analysis to plan implementation of smart i.v. pump technology.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 15, 2006; 63(16): 1528 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
W. N. Kelly and T. D. Rucker
Compelling features of a safe medication-use system.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 1, 2006; 63(15): 1461 - 1468.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
A. M. Pick, F. Massoomi, W. J. Neff, P. L. Danekas, and A. M. Stoysich
A safety assessment tool for formulary candidates.
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 1, 2006; 63(13): 1269 - 1272.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
C M van Tilburg, I P Leistikow, C M A Rademaker, M B Bierings, and A T H van Dijk
Health care failure mode and effect analysis: a useful proactive risk analysis in a pediatric oncology ward
Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2006; 15(1): 58 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement