Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 62, Issue suppl 1, S17-S21
Copyright © 2005 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golan, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golan, Y.

Overview of transplant mycology

Yoav Golan

YOAV GOLAN, M.D., is Assistant Professor of Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Box 41, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111 (ygolan{at}tufts-nemc.org).


Purpose. The epidemiology, clinical manifestation, diagnosis, and management of invasive mycoses in transplant patients are described.

Summary. The incidence of and mortality from invasive mycoses have increased in transplant patients. Candida and Aspergillus are the two most common fungal pathogens in this patient population. The use of immunosuppressive and myeloablative therapies and other factors increases the risk of invasive mycoses. A high index of suspicion and clinical clues are needed for the diagnosis of Candida and Aspergillus infections because reliable diagnostic techniques are not available and the patient presentation is nonspecific. Targeted prophylaxis for patients at high risk for morbidity and mortality and early, aggressive treatment using broad-spectrum antifungal agents are recommended. Prophylaxis using itraconazole reduces the risk of treatment failure due to resistant pathogens compared with fluconazole. Voriconazole might prove advantageous compared with fluconazole and itraconazole for prophylaxis because of its extended spectrum and predictable blood levels. Caspofungin seems as effective as and less toxic than amphotericin B for this use. Voriconazole is more effective than amphotericin B for the treatment of aspergillosis. Caspofungin is comparable to voriconazole in efficacy as salvage treatment after failure to respond to other antifungal agents.

Conclusion. Caspofungin plus voriconazole and other combination therapies often are used for the treatment of aspergillosis yet data to support such use are yet to be produced. The investigational agents posaconazole, micafungin, and anidulafungin appear promising as salvage treatment of various invasive mycoses.

Index terms: Amphotericin B; Antifungals; Aspergillosis; Blood levels; Candidiasis; Caspofungin; Diagnosis; Epidemiology; Fluconazole; Immunosuppressive agents; Itraconazole; Mortality; Mycoses; Posaconazole; Resistance; Spectrum microbial; Transplantation; Voriconazole

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement