Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 63, Issue 4, 317-322
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kemner, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lage, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kemner, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Lage, M. J.

Reports

Effect of methylphenidate formulation on treatment patterns and use of emergency room services

Jason E. Kemner and Maureen J. Lage

JASON E. KEMNER, M.P.H., is Associate Director, Medical Science Liaison, Ortho Urology, McNeil Consumer and Specialty Products, Fort Washington, PA. MAUREEN J. LAGE, PH.D., is Managing Member, HealthMetrics Outcomes Research, LLC, Groton, CT.

Address correspondence to Dr. Lage at HealthMetrics Outcomes Research, LLC, 120 Anchorage Circle, Groton, CT 06340 (lagemj{at}hlthmetrics.com).


Purpose. The treatment patterns of and use of emergency room services by patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) who initiated therapy with thrice-daily, immediate-release (IR) methylphenidate versus once-daily, extended-release (ER) oral system methylphenidate were studied.

Methods. Using a large claims database, patients who were newly initiated on either ER methylphenidate or IR methylphenidate were retrospectively identified. Analysis of covariance was used to examine differences in treatment patterns between individuals who initiated therapy on ER methylphenidate and those who initiated therapy on IR methylphenidate. Multivariate regressions were used to examine the probability of visiting the emergency room and the number of visits to the emergency room.

Results. Of the 5939 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 4785 were initiated on ER methylphenidate and 1154 were initiated on IR methylphenidate. Significantly fewer patients initiated on ER methylphenidate had a 15- or 30-day gap in therapy or switched to another ADHD medication (p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). In addition, patients initiated on the ER formulation had a significantly longer duration of therapy than did those who received IR methylphenidate (p < 0.0001). Patients who received initial treatment with ER methylphenidate were also significantly less likely to visit an emergency room (odds ratio, 0.79; p = 0.01) and had, on average, 0.21 fewer visit to the emergency room (p = 0.0101).

Conclusion. A retrospective analysis of a patient database demonstrated that initial treatment with ER methylphenidate for patients with ADHD was associated with longer treatment periods, fewer switches in therapy, increased patient adherence, and a lower usage rate of emergency room services compared with initial treatment with IR methylphenidate.

Index terms: Attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity; Central nervous system stimulants; Compliance; Dosage schedules; Drug use; Formulations; Hospitals; Methylphenidate; Patients; Release; Sustained-action medications

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.