Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 10, 1087-1091
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lizer, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brackbill, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lizer, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Brackbill, M. L.

Notes

Medication history reconciliation by pharmacists in an inpatient behavioral health unit

Mitsi H. Lizer and Marcia L. Brackbill

MITSI H. LIZER, PHARM.D., CGP, is Assistant Professor Pharmacy Practice, and MARCIA L. BRACKBILL, PHARM.D., is Associate Professor Pharmacy Practice, Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA.

Address correspondence to Dr. Lizer at the Bernard J. Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, 1775 North Sector Court, Winchester, VA 22601 (mlizer{at}su.edu).


Purpose. The effectiveness of a pharmacy-obtained medication history on the medication reconciliation process in the behavioral health unit (BHU) of a community hospital was studied.

Methods. Patients admitted to the BHU of a 411-bed, not-for-profit hospital from 6 a.m. on Monday through 12 p.m. on Friday from September 1, 2005, through October 6, 2005, were candidates for the study. Within 18 hours of admission to the BHU and after the medication history had been obtained by a nurse, a pharmacy technician gathered patient demographic and medication information from the chart and the patient’s medication bottles. Once the technician completed the documentation, the pharmacist was notified of a new admission. The pharmacist reviewed the collected documentation and patient chart before interviewing the patient.

Results. Of the 54 patients who met the study’s inclusion criteria, 91% were seen by a pharmacist within 18 hours of admission. The mean ± S.D. time delay to interview the patient was 11.6 ± 5.1 hours. Pharmacists spent a mean of 13.9 minutes completing patients’ medication histories. The mean ± S.D. number of medications identified by nursing on admission was 4.0 ± 3.2, compared with 5.3 ± 3.7 identified by pharmacists (p < 0.05). The mean number of medication discrepancies identified per patient was 2.9. Of the discrepancies, 48% were related to an omitted or incorrect medication, 31% to an omitted or incorrect dose, and 13% to an omitted or incorrect frequency; 8% were categorized as miscellaneous.

Conclusion. Pharmacists’ participation in obtaining patients’ medication histories through chart review and patient interview increased the effectiveness of the medication reconciliation process in an inpatient BHU.

Index terms: Errors, medication; Hospitals; Patient information; Pharmaceutical services; Pharmacists, hospital; Pharmacy, institutional, hospital

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
B. L. Carter, K. B. Farris, P. W. Abramowitz, D. B. Weetman, P. J. Kaboli, J. D. Dawson, P. A. James, A. J. Christensen, and J. M. Brooks
The Iowa Continuity of Care study: Background and methods
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., September 1, 2008; 65(17): 1631 - 1642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.