Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 13, 1415-1421
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daugherty, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Daugherty, N. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, K. M.

Notes

Board certification of pharmacy residency program directors

Noelle E. Daugherty, Melody Ryan, Frank Romanelli and Kelly M. Smith

NOELLE E. DAUGHERTY, PHARM.D., is Postgraduate Year Two Ambulatory Care Pharmacy Resident, University of Kentucky (UK) HealthCare, Lexington. MELODY RYAN, PHARM.D., M.P.H., BCPS, is Associate Professor; FRANK ROMANELLI, PHARM.D., M.P.H., BCPS, is Associate Professor; and KELLY M. SMITH, PHARM.D., is Associate Professor, College of Pharmacy, UK, Lexington.

Address correspondence to Dr. Smith at the University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, 800 Rose Street, Room H110, Lexington, KY 40536-0293 (ksmit1{at}email.uky.edu).


Purpose. A survey was conducted of residency program directors (RPDs) to identify the extent of their Board of Pharmaceutical Specialties (BPS) certification and their motivations and incentives to obtain certification, to determine the number of RPDs who meet the new American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) post-graduate year 2 (PGY2) residency standard for board certification, and to investigate the relationships between RPDs’ characteristics and BPS certification.

Methods. A 35-item, electronic questionnaire was developed to obtain data on the type of residency program or geographic setting and the RPD’s practice setting, job title, faculty rank, education and training, length of practice, length of time served as an RPD, and certifications obtained.

Results. Of 717 surveys, 327 were completed. More than one third of all RPDs were currently BPS certified compared with a 30% RPD certification rate according to the BPS directory. A higher percentage of PGY2 RPDs were BPS certified overall compared with PGY1 RPDs. Eighty-two RPDs had completed an ASHP-accredited specialized residency program and were more likely to be BPS certified.

Conclusion. In a survey of RPDs, more than one third of the respondents were BPS certified; professional and personal development was the most common motivation to earn certification. New pharmacy residency accreditation standards did not appear to be an important motivator for certification. Of the RPDs who will require board certification with the new standards, 71% already met the requirement. RPDs who practiced in academia or focused on critical care were more likely to be certified than those with training or positions in community practice or practice management.

Index terms: American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; Certification; Data collection; Education, pharmaceutical; Educators; Pharmacy; Specialties; Standards

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.