Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 17, 1845-1850
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Straight, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Heaton, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Straight, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Heaton, P. C.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 17, 1845-1850
Copyright © 2007. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Notes

Emergency department care for victims of sexual offense

Jeanette D. Straight and Pamela C. Heaton

JEANETTE D. STRAIGHT, PHARM.D., is Clinical Specialist of General Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. PAMELA C. HEATON, B.S.PHARM., PH.D., is Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Address correspondence to Dr. Heaton at the College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, 3223 Eden Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0004 (pam.heaton{at}uc.edu).


Purpose. Emergency department (ED) care for sexual offense victims was studied and compared with national treatment guidelines.

Methods. This retrospective study analyzed data from the 2003 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. ED visits were selected based on the reason for the patient’s visit, diagnosis, and cause of visit. ED visits were evaluated as two subgroups: rape or sexual assault and molestation or other sexual offense. Data were analyzed to determine whether certain screening procedures were performed, including pregnancy testing, HIV serology testing, urinalysis, cervical or urethral culture, and urine culture. Medication codes for each patient visit were examined to determine if antibiotics, antiretrovirals, emergency contraceptives, anxiolytics, analgesics, or antiemetics were provided.

Results. In 2003, there were 251,762 ED visits for a sexual offense; 179,149 of these were for sexual assault or rape and 72,613 for molestation or other sexual offense. Nearly 70% of visits did not involve the prescribing of antibiotic therapy, and during only 6.7% of visits was appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, provided. For female victims age 12 years or older, pregnancy tests were performed during 36.7% of visits for sexual assault or rape and 6.7% of visits for molestation or other sex crimes. Only 13% of sexual assault or rape victims received HIV serology testing. Sufficient care was provided during only 20.4% of all visits for sexual offense victims.

Conclusion. The majority of victims of a sexual offense in the United States in 2003 did not receive sufficient care in the ED in accordance with national treatment guidelines.

Index terms: Antiinfective agents; Emergency services; Hospitals; Protocols; Rational therapy; Sex offenses; Tests, laboratory

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.