Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 17, 1859-1866
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bahl, V.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bahl, V.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, J. G.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 17, 1859-1866
Copyright © 2007. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Case Study

Developing dashboards to measure and manage inpatient pharmacy costs

Vinita Bahl, Scott R. McCreadie and James G. Stevenson

VINITABAHL, D.M.D., M.P.P., is Director, Clinical Information and Decision Support Services; and SCOTT R. MCCREADIE, PHARM.D., M.B.A., is Strategic Projects Coordinator, Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, Ann Arbor. JAMES G. STEVENSON, PHARM.D., FASHP, is Director of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, and Professor and Associate Dean for Clinical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Address correspondence to Dr. Stevenson at the Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Michigan Hospitals, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 (jimsteve{at}umich.edu).


Purpose. A pharmacy dashboard was developed and implemented to identify trends in drug use; normalize data for patient volumes; allow the user to determine whether changes were due to cost increases, actual use changes, or both; permit evaluation of drug use within key diagnoses for individual services; and allow multiple formats and layers of analysis.

Summary. At the University of Michigan, a drug cost and drug-use database had been developed, and an enterprise data warehouse had been implemented. The data warehouse served as the core data source for the pharmacy dashboard effort. The department of pharmacy services worked with the clinical information and decision support services (CIDSS) unit to develop and promote the use of the pharmacy dashboard. On the basis of the core data in the data warehouse, the dashboard was designed to harness these data for the useful and actionable presentation to service chiefs, individual house officers, and administration for a better understanding of drug costs and use within the institution. In addition to the drug cost and drug-use trend data, the dashboard included help features such as access to the Drugdex database for detailed clinical information about specific drugs, including indications, adverse effects, and drug interactions.

Conclusion. The cost reports that were developed through the collaboration between the CIDSS and the department of pharmacy services have permitted a more robust understanding of drug-use trends by a wider audience of physician leaders and clinical pharmacists at the institution. These data are critical in formulating strategies to control drug expenses by each service.

Index terms: Computers; Costs; Drug use; Economics; Pharmacy, institutional, hospital

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.