Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiscella, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiscella, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. K.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 19, 2069-2073
Copyright © 2007. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Notes

Topical ophthalmic fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: Appropriate use and cost considerations

Richard G. Fiscella, Charles C. Lewis and Michael K. Jensen

RICHARD G. FISCELLA, B.S.PHARM., M.P.H., is Clinical Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, and Adjunctive Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago. CHARLES C. LEWIS, B.S.PHARM, M.B.A., is Managing Partner, Jasos Group LLC, Lake Mary, FL. MICHAEL K. JENSEN, B.S.PHARM., M.S., is Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City.

Address correspondence to Mr. Fiscella at the Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, 833 South Wood Street, Chicago, IL 60612 (fisc{at}uic.edu).


Purpose. The utilization and refill rates of topical ophthalmic fourth-generation fluoroquinolones among physicians, as well as the associated costs, were studied.

Methods. A large data set of retrospective pharmacy prescription claims was obtained from multiple plans, including commercial managed care organizations, Medicaid, and Medicare. The data included the number and cost of all new and refill prescriptions for six months for gatifloxacin 0.3% and moxifloxacin 0.5% by physician specialty. New prescription and refill data were also analyzed from a state Medicaid plan to determine if similar trends existed.

Results. Primary care physicians wrote approximately 7,000 (7.7%) gatifloxacin and 84,000 (92.3%) moxifloxacin prescriptions, with pediatricians accounting for 4,000 (5.1%) gatifloxacin and 75,000 (94.9%) moxifloxacin prescriptions. Eye care physicians accounted for a similar amount of prescriptions for each antibiotic during the same period. The total cost of prescriptions for all primary care practitioners was approximately $170,000 for gatifloxacin and $2.5 million for moxifloxacin; prescriptions written by pediatricians accounted for $110,000 for gatifloxacin and $2.2 million for moxifloxacin.

Conclusion. Prescription drug claims from payers using pharmacy benefit management companies during a six-month period indicated that the numbers of prescriptions written for gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin were similar among eye care physicians, but primary care physicians wrote a greater number of prescriptions for moxifloxacin. Analysis of claims to a Medicaid database revealed an increase in the prescriptions written by primary care physicians for moxifloxacin after its addition to the drug formulary.

Index terms: Costs; Drug use; Gatifloxacin; Moxifloxacin; Ophthalmic preparations; Prescribing; Quinolones; Rational therapy

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement