HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hellums, M. Articles by Monk-Tutor, M. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hellums, M. Articles by Monk-Tutor, M. R.

MAC HELLUMS, PHARM.D., is Pharmacy Resident, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Birmingham; at the time of this study he was a Pharm.D. student at McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University, Birmingham. SUSAN P. ALVERSON, D.P.A., B.S., is Assistant Professor of Pharmacy Administration and Associate Dean of Students; and MARYR . MONK-TUTOR, PH.D., M.S., B.S., FASHP, is Professor of Pharmacy Administration and Director of Academic Programs, McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University.

Address correspondence to Dr. Monk-Tutor at McWhorter School of Pharmacy, Samford University, 800 Lakeshore Drive, Birmingham, AL 35229 (mrmonktu{at}samford.edu).

Purpose. The extent of didactic and laboratory instruction related to compounded sterile preparations (CSPs) provided by U.S. schools of pharmacy was studied. Methods. A nine-item survey was developed and mailed to the deans of 82 U.S. schools of pharmacy in 2005. The survey instrument was designed to gather basic demographic information about the school of pharmacy, identify availability and characteristics of instruction offered on the compounding of sterile preparations, identify which of 20 topics were covered in either a didactic or laboratory setting, determine how students’ skills in sterile preparation were assessed, and identify the compounding environment at the school of pharmacy. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results. A total of 53 surveys were returned, yielding a response rate of 65%. All schools included some instruction on CSPs; however, only 70% required students to compound on their own (rather than in groups or not at all), and only 21% offered a standalone course on this topic. Most schools (88%) taught students about U.S. Pharmacopeia chapter 797 standards for sterile compounding. Only 13% of schools felt that their students had adequate training in compounding sterile preparations before graduation; however, most (88.7%) believed that students could only become fully competent in these skills over time in actual practice. Conclusion. A survey sent to deans of pharmacy schools revealed that instruction provided to pharmacy students in preparing CSPs varied widely. Only about a sixth of respondents believed that their students were adequately trained in compounding sterile preparations before graduation. Index terms: Compounding; Curriculum; Data collection; Education, pharmaceutical; Sterile products