Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, T. W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Varner, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, T. W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Varner, C. F.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 24, 2579-2582
Copyright © 2007. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Notes

Blood pressure management in acute hypertensive emergency

Tyson W. A. Brooks, Christopher K. Finch, Bob L. Lobo, Paul R . Deaton and C. Ferrell Varner

TYSON W. A. BROOKS, PHARM.D., BCPS, is Assistant Professor, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO; at the time of this study he was Pharmacy Practice Resident, Methodist University Hospital (MUH), Memphis, TN. CHRISTOPHER K. FINCH, PHARMD.,. BCPS, is Critical Care Clinical Specialist; BOB L. LOBO, PHARMD.,. BCPS, is Assistant Director, Clinical Pharmacy; PAUL R. DEATON, M.D., is Head of Intensive Care Unit; and C. FERRELL VARNER, M.D., is Head of Emergency Medicine, MUH.

Address correspondence to Dr. Finch at the Department of Pharmacy, Methodist University Hospital, 1265 Union Avenue, Memphis, TN 38104 (finchc{at}methodisthealth.org).


Purpose. The frequency with which patients coming to an emergency room with hypertensive emergency received excessive or inadequate blood-pressure reduction was studied.

Methods. A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who were treated for hypertensive emergency at a 696-bed university teaching hospital between November 2003 and April 2004. Patients who received a continuous i.v. infusion of an antihypertensive agent for >30 minutes in the emergency department or the intensive care unit were included in the study. The primary outcomes measured were number of patients treated appropriately, number of patients treated excessively (reduction in mean arterial pressure [MAP] beyond 25% at the end of the two-hour acute-phase treatment window), and number of treatment failures within the two-hour window.

Results. A total of 427 patients with hypertensive emergency were identified, of whom 47 met the study criteria. Fifteen patients (32%) were appropriately treated, 27 (57%) were excessively treated, and 5 (11%) had treatment failures during the two-hour acute-phase treatment period. Only 6 patients (13%) had been appropriately treated at six hours. Patients who were given nicardipine had a greater risk of an excessive MAP reduction at two hours than all other patients. One or more treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44 patients (94%).

Conclusion. Excessive reduction of MAP was common among patients who came to an emergency department with hypertensive emergency.

Index terms: Hospitals; Hypertensive crisis; Hypotensive agents; Injections; Nicardipine; Rational therapy; Toxicity

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.