Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 5, 521-525
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsen, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Fotis, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsen, E. V.
Right arrow Articles by Fotis, M. A.

Notes

Developing a model to determine the effects of adverse drug events in hospital inpatients

Egil V. Nilsen and Michael A. Fotis

EGIL V. NILSEN, M.S., is Director, Operations and Quality Improvement, Department of Performance Management, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla Campus, Valhalla, NY; at the time of the study he was Managing Consultant, Navigant Consulting, Inc., Chicago, IL. MICHAEL A. FOTIS, B.S.PHARM., is Director, Pharmacy Practice Residency, and Manager, Drug Information Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago.

Address correspondence to Mr. Nilsen at TCC Executive Offices, 95 Grasslands Road, Valhalla, NY 10595.


Purpose. A study was conducted to develop a model to identify adverse drug events (ADEs) and quantify their effect on quality and cost in a large tertiary care hospital.

Methods. The drug–ADE relationship between unfractionated heparin and heparin-induced bleeding was studied for all inpatients receiving heparin infusions at the hospital between January 1 and December 31, 2004. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) values were used to help determine if the patients received blood products in response to excessive anticoagulation with heparin. The number of aPTT values of ≥150 seconds and the last aPTT value before discharge were evaluated. The key outcome measures were length of stay, cost per admission, and mortality. Of the 1455 admissions to the hospital, 122 patients received blood products before receiving heparin infusion only, 264 received blood products after receiving the drug only, 221 received blood products both before and after, and 848 who received the drug never received blood products.

Results. Differences in full cost and length of stay between the group receiving heparin infusion only and the groups receiving both blood products were significant. Differences in mortality between the group only receiving heparin infusion and the groups receiving both heparin infusion and blood products were also significant.

Conclusion. Using the model developed to study the effect of heparin-induced bleeding, we found that the cost per patient day was highest for patients receiving blood products after heparin infusion treatment. There was a positive correlation between one or more aPTT values of ≥150 seconds and undesirable patient outcomes.

Index terms: Anticoagulants; Blood derivatives; Costs; Economics; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hospitals; Methodology; Models; Mortality; Patient care; Quality assurance; Toxicity

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.