Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 64, Issue 7, 740-746
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speerhas, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Seidner, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Speerhas, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Seidner, D. L.

Clinical Reports

Measured versus estimated aluminum content of parenteral nutrient solutions

Rex A. Speerhas and Douglas L. Seidner

REX A. SPEERHAS, B.S.PHARM., CDE, BCNSP, is Nutrition Support Clinical Specialist, Department of Pharmacy; and DOUGLAS L. SEIDNER, M.D., FACG, CNSP, is Director, Nutrition Support Team, Department of Gastroenterology and Hematology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.

Address correspondence to Mr. Speerhas at the Department of Pharmacy, QQb-5, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195 (speerhr{at}ccf.org).


Purpose. A study was conducted to directly measure the aluminum concentration in a select number of parenteral nutrient (PN) solutions and to compare this value with the calculated dose using the concentrations reported by the manufacturer.

Methods. Fifty 2.5-mL samples were prepared for analysis and were obtained from PN solutions prepared for adult and pediatric/neonatal patients. Intravenous large-volume parenterals were used as controls. Samples were sent to two different reference laboratories. Batch 1 included 26 samples, 22 from PN solutions, 1 control, and 3 paired (duplicate) samples selected from the 22 PN bags. Because 8 of the samples were lost to analysis, a second batch of samples was included. Batch 2 consisted of 24 samples from 4 PN solutions and 2 controls. Batch 2 was composed of four aliquots from each solution that were divided equally and sent to the two laboratories.

Results. Twenty-three values were used in the statistical analysis. The results showed that only two of the adult PN solutions equaled or exceeded the threshold set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for measured aluminum exposure. The measured concentration of aluminum for all six of the pediatric and neonatal solutions met or exceeded the FDA threshold; however, this value was much lower than what had been estimated using the labeled aluminum concentration at expiry.

Conclusion. In PN solutions expected to have a moderately high concentration of aluminum, the measured amount of aluminum was far less than the amount that would be estimated by calculation using the labeled concentrations of aluminum in each of the ingredients.

Index terms: Additives; Aluminum; Concentration; Contamination; Control, quality; Food and Drug Administration (U.S.); Labeling; Metals; Nutrition; Pediatrics

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
R. O Brown, L. M Morgan, S. K Bhattacharya, P. L Johnson, G. Minard, and R. N Dickerson
Potential Aluminum Exposure from Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2008; 42(10): 1410 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement