Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weber, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Phelps, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weber, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Phelps, P.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 65, Issue 12, 1184-1191
Copyright © 2008. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Case Studies

Implementation of standard order sets for patient-controlled analgesia

Lynn Marie Weber, Virginia L. Ghafoor and Pamela Phelps

LYNN MARIE WEBER, PHARM.D., is Clinical Pharmacist; and VIRGINIA L. GHAFOOR, PHARM.D., is Clinical Pharmacist—Pain Management, University of Minnesota Medical Center—Fairview, Minneapolis. PAMELA PHELPS, PHARM.D., FASHP, is Director of Clinical Pharmacy Services, Fairview Health Services, Minneapolis.

Address correspondence to Dr. Ghafoor at the University of Minnesota Medical Center—Fairview, 2450 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454 (vghafoo1{at}fairview.org).


Purpose. The implementation of standard order sets for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is described.

Summary. A review of naloxone usage at the University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC) from January to June 2004 found that 8% of patients receiving PCA had severe respiratory depression. A subanalysis of each event found that 85% of these patients had never before received opioid therapy. To reduce the risk of respiratory depression with PCA, separate standard order sets were developed for patients new to or tolerant of opioid therapy. A major component of both order sets was the standardization of a 10-minute lockout interval between each PCA dose. Implementation of the new PCA order sets raised concerns among health care professionals at UMMC that medication safety may be improved at the cost of increased pain. After implementation of the order sets, prescriber compliance, pharmacist interventions, the frequency of adverse effects, and patients’ pain management were evaluated. After implementation of standard order sets for patients receiving PCA, 57% of patients’ pain was documented as being controlled, and the orders for 93% of patients were in compliance with the recommended dosage interval of ≥10 minutes. There were no reports of oversedation or respiratory depression requiring reversal with naloxone.

Conclusion. The implementation of standard order sets for PCA resulted in a dramatic decrease in the number of cases of severe respiratory depression and increased use of the order set for patients new to opioid therapy. Changing the order sets to improve medication safety did not appear to negatively affect patients’ satisfaction with pain management.

Index terms: Dosage schedules; Hospitals; Medication orders; Naloxone; Opiate antagonists; Opiates; Pain; Patient-controlled analgesia; Respiratory insufficiency; Toxicity

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement