Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meidl, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brierton, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meidl, T. M.
Right arrow Articles by Brierton, D. G.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 65, Issue 15, 1464-1469
Copyright © 2008. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Case Studies

Implementation of pharmacy services in a telemedicine intensive care unit

Tracy M. Meidl, Thomas W. Woller, Arlene M. Iglar and Dennis G. Brierton

TRACY M. MEIDL, PHARM.D., is Inpatient Pharmacy Supervisor; THOMAS W. WOLLER, M.S., FASHP, is Vice President of Pharmacy Services; ARLENE M. IGLAR, M.S., is Regional Director of Pharmacy; and DENNIS G. BRIERTON, PHARMD., BCPS, is Director of Clinical. Pharmacy Services, Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI.

Address correspondence to Dr. Meidl at the Inpatient Pharmacy, Aurora Health Care, 2900 West Oklahoma Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53217 (tracy.meidl{at}aurora.org).


Purpose. The implementation of a remote intensive care unit (ICU) pharmacy service in a 13-hospital health system is discussed.

Summary. Significant challenges for small hospitals are timely, consistent delivery of critical care and being able to have highly experienced critical care physicians, nurses, and pharmacists available onsite within the ICU during all hours of the day. To remedy these problems, Aurora Health Care turned to telemedicine. All 246 ICU beds in the health system are connected to a remote, office-based ICU monitoring facility powered by the eICU, a telemedicine technology. The remote ICU is located in an independent facility. The staff consists of 5.2 full-time equivalent (FTE) pharmacists and 2.2 FTE pharmacy technicians and they monitor ICU patients at all of the hospitals in the system. Each remote ICU pharmacist was educated about expectations and is familiar with the different site processes and practices. All hospitals in the system were required to implement order-scanning technology to allow the remote ICU pharmacy staff to efficiently process orders. Computerized physician order entry, which results in orders being received directly by the pharmacy information system for verification, was also implemented within the system. The remote ICU pharmacists make recommendations for problems to either the hospital-based staff or the remote ICU team. Appropriate antimicrobial coverage and formulary support were the most common recommendations. Cost reduction is an important element of the remote ICU pharmacy service, but the primary motivation for implementation was to improve the quality of patient care.

Conclusion. Implementation of a remote ICU pharmacy service in a 13-hospital health system resulted in the provision of consistent pharmaceutical care while minimizing costs.

Index terms: Economics; Hospitals; Patient care; Pharmaceutical care; Pharmaceutical services; Pharmacists, hospital; Pharmacy, institutional, hospital; Quality assurance; Telemedicine

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement