Advertisement
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krogh, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomley, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krogh, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Thomley, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 65, Issue 2, 154-157
Copyright © 2008. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00

Notes

Comparison of two personal-computer-based mobile devices to support pharmacists’ clinical documentation

 Paul R. Krogh, Steve Rough and Sylvia Thomley

PAUL R. KROGH, PHARMD.,. M.S., is Operations Manager, Abbott Northwestern Hospital Pharmacy, Minneapolis, MN; when this study was conducted, he was Administrative Pharmacy Resident, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics (UWHC), Madison. STEVE ROUGH, M.S., B.S.PHARM., is Director, Pharmacy Services, Pharmacy Administration, and SYLVIA THOMLEY, PHARMD., M.S., is Pharmacy. Manager, Pharmacy—Inpatient Services, UWHC.

Address correspondence to Dr. Krogh at Abbott Northwestern Hospital Pharmacy, Mail Route 11321, 800 East 28th Street, Minneapolis, MN 55407-3709 (paul.krogh{at}allina.com).


Purpose. Two personal-computer (PC)-based mobile devices used to support electronic clinical pharmacy documentation on two decentralized units at a large academic medical center were compared.

Methods. A five-week, two-phase pilot study was performed to compare a laptop computer on a mobile cart ("computer on wheels," or COW) with a tablet PC for pharmacist preference and ability to support electronic clinical documentation. The study was performed on the inpatient transplant unit and the pediatric hematology–oncology unit. At the end of each study phase, participating pharmacists were asked to complete a survey to ascertain their satisfaction with the mobile device tested in that period.

Results. Eight pharmacists participated in the study and completed the survey. Only one pharmacist agreed that the COW was nonintrusive and easy to maneuver. In contrast, all eight pharmacists found the tablet PC nonintrusive and easy to maneuver. Eight pharmacists agreed that the tablet PC was satisfactory overall, and four agreed that the COW was satisfactory overall.

Conclusion. Pharmacists preferred a tablet PC over a mobile cart with a laptop computer for supporting electronic clinical documentation. Limitations in software functionality and the fast pace of multidisciplinary rounds on one patient unit forced pharmacists to retain some form of paper documentation, whereas the slower pace on another unit allowed paper documentation to be abandoned.

Index terms: Clinical pharmacists; Clinical pharmacy; Computers; Data collection; Documentation; Pharmaceutical services

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?