Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kishel, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Julian, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kishel, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Julian, K.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 66, Issue 14, 1304-1308
Copyright © 2009. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Case Study

Implementing an electronically based, nurse-driven pneumococcal vaccination protocol for inpatients

Joseph J. Kishel, Melissa Maguire, Lorraine Pankratz and Kathleen Julian

JOSEPH J. KISHEL, PHARM.D., BCPS (AQ-ID), is Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Infectious Diseases; MELISSA MAGUIRE, B.S.N., RN, is Informatics Specialist; LORRAINEP ANKRATZ, R.N., is Clinical Performance Improvement Specialist; and KATHLEEN JULIAN, M.D., is Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA.

Address correspondence to Dr. Kishel at the Pharmacy, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, H079, Hershey, PA 17033 (jkishel{at}psu.edu).


Purpose. The development and implementation of an electronically based, nurse-driven pneumococcal vaccination protocol for hospitalized patients are described.

Summary. A multidisciplinary team was formed to address the development, implementation, and management of an automatic pneumococcal vaccination program. Screening of patients was performed by the nursing staff on admission to the hospital; the screening process was streamlined using computer-generated assessment forms. The electronic program enabled systematic identification of patients eligible for vaccination, standardization of vaccine order instructions, documentation of vaccinations in a centralized electronic database, automatic documentation of vaccinations on patients’ discharge instructions, and collection of vaccination data for future analysis. If vaccination was indicated, an electronic order was automatically generated for the vaccine to be administered within 24 hours. The electronic order appeared on the electronic medication administration record like any other medication. Given the prominent role of nursing in the protocol, the largest training effort was in the nursing department, with education targeting 1200 nurses. Precautions were taken to minimize unintended duplicate vaccine administration. Patients were excluded from the vaccination protocol if they were younger than age 65 years, had a fever, were still in an intensive care unit, had an acute neurologic disorder, or had any condition for which there was doubt about the safety or appropriateness of the vaccination. Multidisciplinary resources are used to further reevaluate and refine the vaccine protocol.

Conclusion. A multidisciplinary team successfully developed and implemented an electronically based, nurse-driven pneumococcal vaccination protocol for hospitalized patients in a teaching hospital.

Index terms: Computers; Hospitals; Immunization; Nurses; Pneumococcal infections; Pneumococcal vaccines; Protocols; Team; Vaccines

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement