Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wender, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wender, R. H.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 66, Issue 1_Supplement_1, S3-S10
Copyright © 2009. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00

Do current antiemetic practices result in positive patient outcomes? Results of a new study

Ronald H. Wender

RONALD H. WENDER, M.D., is Co-Chair, Department of Anesthesiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Adjunct Professor and Academic Chair, Cedars-Sinai Anesthesia Residency, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048 (ronaldwender{at}sbcglobal.net).


Purpose. The problem of perioperative nausea and vomiting (including postoperative and postdischarge nausea and vomiting [PONV/PDNV]) among people undergoing general anesthesia is discussed.

Summary. Nausea and vomiting are not limited to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) or the hospital, but can persist long after the patient has been discharged and has returned home. This underscores the need for new antiemetic agents that not only offer greater efficacy and proven safety, but also provide an extended duration of action. The Prospective Observational Study of Treatments, Outcomes and Patterns of Care (POSTOP), was designed to assess the impact that current antiemetic practices have on patient outcomes in the postoperative and postdischarge settings. The investigation assessed the treatments, outcomes, and patterns of care for PONV and PDNV in high-risk patients over the course of 72 hours following surgery. Based on this observational study, despite the availability of current guidelines there is no current standard of care for managing PONV and PDNV.

Conclusion. Increasing the adherence to guidelines and the rational use of prophylaxis based on patient stratification will reduce the incidence of PONV, as will the development of new antiemetic agents with greater efficacies and longer durations of action that can provide extended protection from nausea and vomiting throughout the 72-hour postsurgical period.

Index terms: Anesthetics; Antiemetics; Duration of action; Postoperative nausea and vomiting; Protocols; Toxicity

 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement