Advertisement
Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunteman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunteman, L.
Right arrow Articles by Heckman, M.
American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Vol. 66, Issue 4, 373-377
Copyright © 2009. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. All rights reserved. 1079-2082/04/0602-1242$06.00


Notes

Analysis of allergy alerts within a computerized prescriber-order-entry system

Lori Hunteman, Leah Ward, Diane Read, Mona Jolly and Michael Heckman

LORI HUNTEMAN, PHARM.D., is Medication Safety Pharmacist, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; at the time of writing, she was Pharmacy Resident, Mayo Clinic. LEAH WARD, PHARM.D., is Therapeutic Policy Management Coordinator; DIANE READ, B.S.PHARM., is Automation and Technology Pharmacist; MONA JOLLY, B.S., is Senior Consultant; and MICHAEL HECKMAN, B.S., is Biostatistician, Mayo Clinic.

Address correspondence to Dr. Hunteman at the Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (hunteman.lori{at}mayo.edu).


Purpose. Allergy alerts within a computerized prescriber-order-entry (CPOE) system were analyzed.

Methods. A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate inpatient CPOE orders that triggered an allergy alert for one month in November 2007. Data were extracted from a computer-generated report to identify the total number of prescription orders and the number of orders triggering an allergy alert during the study time frame. When overriding an allergy alert from the CPOE system, prescribers had to choose one of three rationales: the benefit outweighs the risk, the patient previously tolerated the medication, and the medication is therapeutically appropriate. Data collected included the number of allergy alerts, allergy alert overrides, override rationale, and patients’ demographic information. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results.

Results. Allergy alerts were triggered on 643 (1.3%) of the 49,887 total orders entered during the month (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2–1.4%). Alerts were triggered on a total of 289 patients, with a mean of 2 orders triggering alerts per patient. The median age was 65 years old. The median hospital stay for patients with an order triggering an alert was three days. Overall, 625 of 643 alerts (97%) were overridden for rationales as following: the patient previously tolerated the medication (49%), the benefit outweighed the risk (29%), and the medication was therapeutically appropriate (24%), and a free text explanation (8%).

Conclusion. While a small portion of prescription orders generated through a CPOE system triggered an allergy alert, most of the allergy alerts were overridden by prescribers.

Index terms: Allergies; Computers; Hospitals; Medication orders; Physicians; Prescribing

 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. J. Cash
Alert fatigue
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., December 1, 2009; 66(23): 2098 - 2101.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.
Advertisement