Note |
PHILLIP S. OWEN, PHARM.D., BCPS, is Critical Care Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, Department of Pharmacy Practice, and Clinical Assistant Professor, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Center, Mercer University (MU), Atlanta, GA. ELYN C. TAN, PHARM.D., is Postdoctorate Research Fellow, Xcenda Health Outcomes Research, Tampa, FL; at the time of writing she was student, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences Center, MU. TYREE H. KISER, PHARM.D., BCPS, is Critical Care Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, University of Colorado Hospital (UCH), Aurora, and Assistant Professor, School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado—Denver (UCD), Aurora. DOUGLAS N. FISH, PHARM.D., FCCM, FCCP, BCPS, is Critical Care. Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, UCH, and Professor, School of Pharmacy, UCD. ROBERT MACLAREN, PHARM.D., FCCM, FCCP, is Critical Care Clinical Pharmacy Specialist, UCH, and Associate Professor, School of Pharmacy, UCD
Address correspondence to Dr. MacLaren at the School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado Denver, Academic Office 1, C-238-L15-1421, 12631 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045 (rob.maclaren{at}ucdenver.edu).
Methods. Three adjudicated clinical cases of sepsis were developed using composites of real patient scenarios. The patients APACHE II scores were independently assessed by randomly selected critical care practitioners (physicians and nonphysicians). Each case contained at least one reason to consider withholding drotrecogin alfa (activated), but none had a definitive contraindication to drotrecogin alfa (activated). Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were assessed using kappa correlation. Accuracy was assessed by comparing median scores to the adjudicated scores and evaluating correctly classified APACHE II scores.
Results. A total of 21 (42%) physicians and 14 (56%) nonphysicians completed all assessments. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities were 0.16 and 0.49 for the total APACHE II score, respectively. Median calculated APACHE II scores significantly differed for case 1 (p = 0.003) and case 3 (p < 0.0001). The percentage of error in calculating the total APACHE II score approached 85%. The main reasons for administering drotrecogin alfa (activated) were an APACHE II score of
Conclusion. Weak intraobserver agreement, modest interobserver reliability, a high error rate, and low accuracy limited the clinical application of the APACHE II score by untrained practitioners, indicating that the APACHE II score should not be the only determinant for the use of drotrecogin alfa (activated).
Index terms: Antiinflammatory agents; Critical illness; Data collection; Drotrecogin alfa; Methodology; Nurses; Pharmacists; Physicians; Protocols; Rational therapy; Sepsis
Purpose. The reliability and accuracy of practitioner-calculated Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores for determining the appropriateness of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in critically ill patients were evaluated.
25 and multiple organ failures. The main reason for therapy was a high bleeding risk or an APACHE II score of <25.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?